[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: This platform lacks a functioning sem_open implementation



At first glance it looks like some feature is not being detected/enabled
during the python2.7 build.

From
https://buildd.debian.org/status/fetch.php?pkg=python2.7&arch=kfreebsd-amd64&ver=2.7.4-2&stamp=1365768399
:
checking for sem_open... yes
checking for sem_timedwait... yes
checking for sem_getvalue... yes
checking for sem_unlink... yes
[...]
checking whether POSIX semaphores are enabled... no

Not really. We do not support "named semaphores" (sem_open),
but we do support (unnamed semaphores) (sem_init).
The "named only" functions returns ENOSYS.

Petr


Reply to: