On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 03:54:04PM +1000, matthew green wrote: > > hi folks. > > just a FYI. > > not sure if you saw or not, but when netbsd switched to dynamic > everything, a new /libexec directory was created to hold ld.elf_so. > it's not in /lib. Hmmm. The origional plan had said /lib. Oh well. Not crucial for the moment, in any case, since it won't be in the tree until 1.6.x or 1.7 or whatever comes out of -current next; 1.6 has it in /usr/libexec/, and that's where the current setup keeps it for now. We'll deal with it (probably by symlinks) when it moves in the stable upstream codebase. > btw, what is the status of libc vs. glibc? if glibc is the 'default' > how does someone run a standard netbsd application on a deb/netbsd > machine? NetBSD is native libc. FreeBSD is GNU libc. Beward of trying to run native applications, however; they may or may not be linked against the same versions of various libraries that Debian has (though, in theory, if the soname matches it SHOULD work, and if it doesn't, it should fail on the inability to link at runtime). -- *************************************************************************** Joel Baker System Administrator - lightbearer.com lucifer@lightbearer.com http://users.lightbearer.com/lucifer/
Attachment:
pgpS11gXiHlWs.pgp
Description: PGP signature