>1) The rest of the fundamental userland is still GNU. Is this enough to >warrant calling it GNU/NetBSD? Why GNU, I'm tired of this fucking GNU discussion. Here GNU, there GNU, everywhere GNU. Where is the point and where is the message. Call it Debian NetBSD, but Debian GNU/*BSD is silly... NetBSD have nothing to do with GNU and there are so many different paackages in Debian which have nothing to do with GNU and GPL.