[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#703626: marked as done (Debian 6.0.7 i386 netinstaller problem)

Your message dated Sun, 1 Sep 2013 19:23:42 +0200
with message-id <201309011924.00219.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #703626,
regarding Debian 6.0.7 i386 netinstaller problem
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
703626: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=703626
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Boot method: IDE CD-ROM
Image version: http://cdimage.debian.org/debian-cd/6.0.7/i386/iso-cd/debian-6.0.7-i386-netinst.iso
Date: 2013-03-20 21:15:04 CET

Machine: Clone with MSI-6368 motherboard
Processor: cpu family: 6, model: 11, model name: Intel(R) Celeron(TM) CPU 1000
Memory: 1Gb
Partitions: (df -Tl not available ATM)
/dev/sda1 RAID1 /dev/md0 200m Bootable
/dev/sda2 RAID1 /dev/md1 2g
/dev/sda3 RAID1 /dev/md2 8g
/dev/sda4 RAID1 /dev/md3 105g
/dev/sdb1 RAID1 /dev/md0 200m Bootable
/dev/sdb2 RAID1 /dev/md1 2g
/dev/sdb3 RAID1 /dev/md2 8g
/dev/sdb4 RAID1 /dev/md3 105g

/dev/md0 EXT4 /boot
/dev/md1 swap
/dev/md2 EXT4 /
/dev/md3 not used

Output of lspci -knn (or lspci -nn): not available

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot:           [O]
Detect network card:    [O]
Configure network:      [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Install base system:    [E]
Clock/timezone setup:   [ ]
User/password setup:    [ ]
Install tasks:          [ ]
Install boot loader:    [ ]
Overall install:        [ ]

Comments/Problems:

Just after partitioning things go bad:
...
Mar 20 20:58:36 kernel: [  255.868962] Adding 1951724k swap on /dev/md1.  Priority:-1 extents:1 across:1951724k
Mar 20 20:58:38 kernel: [  257.978882] EXT4-fs (md2): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
Mar 20 20:58:38 kernel: [  258.285797] EXT4-fs (md0): mounted filesystem with ordered data mode
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: locale:
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: Cannot set LC_CTYPE to default locale
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: : No such file or directory
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target:
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: locale:
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: Cannot set LC_MESSAGES to default locale
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: : No such file or directory
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target:
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: locale:
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: Cannot set LC_ALL to default locale
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target: : No such file or directory
Mar 20 20:58:41 in-target:
Mar 20 20:58:42 in-target: Can't exec "apt-get": No such file or directory at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress line 130, <STDIN> line 1.
Mar 20 20:58:42 in-target: Use of uninitialized value in vec at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress line 274, <STDIN> line 1.
Mar 20 20:58:42 in-target: Use of uninitialized value in vec at /usr/bin/debconf-apt-progress line 275, <STDIN> line 1.
Mar 20 21:01:01 init: starting pid 276, tty '/dev/tty2': '-/bin/sh'

Full logging: http://pastebin.com/6N8Rh7hy

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they were caused by broken hardware and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are quite old (and thus likely fixed today) and/or
- moreinfo was asked and not given or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: