[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[no subject]



I'm hoping to get armmp udebs added to the kernel before 3.11 is
uploaded (patch posted to debian-kernel but it seems to be lost in the
tubes somewhere), at which point I'd like to add an armmp netboot image,
per the following patch. The patch is obviously pretty trivial but it is
blocked on switching to the 3.11 kernel.

I've tested this (plus the obvious local hacks to use a locally built
kernel) on a Calxeda system and it's functional as far as it goes. It
still needs at least bootloader and kernel selection support figuring
out.

Ian.

commit 3963050274b17f3477988d4af5cb81bf64693b74
Author: Ian Campbell <ijc@hellion.org.uk>
Date:   Mon Aug 26 11:25:56 2013 +0100

    Add armhf armmp netboot image

diff --git a/build/config/armhf.cfg b/build/config/armhf.cfg
index 216e512..a0815ae 100644
--- a/build/config/armhf.cfg
+++ b/build/config/armhf.cfg
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-SUBARCH_SUPPORTED = mx5 vexpress
+SUBARCH_SUPPORTED = armmp mx5 vexpress
 
 MKLIBS = mklibs --ldlib=/lib/ld-linux-armhf.so.3
 
diff --git a/build/config/armhf/armmp.cfg b/build/config/armhf/armmp.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b5121e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/config/armhf/armmp.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
+MEDIUM_SUPPORTED = netboot
+
+# The version of the kernel to use.
+KERNELVERSION := $(KERNELVERSION)-armmp
diff --git a/build/config/armhf/armmp/netboot.cfg b/build/config/armhf/armmp/netboot.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..ba79589
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/config/armhf/armmp/netboot.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+MEDIA_TYPE = netboot image
+
+TARGET = $(INITRD) $(KERNEL)
+EXTRANAME = $(MEDIUM)/
+
+MANIFEST-INITRD = "netboot initrd"
+MANIFEST-KERNEL = "kernel image to netboot"
+
diff --git a/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armhf/armmp.cfg b/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armhf/armmp.cfg
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4c01d74
--- /dev/null
+++ b/build/pkg-lists/netboot/armhf/armmp.cfg
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+nic-modules-${kernel:Version}
+

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: