Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200 with message-id <201308251243.25305.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old installation-reports has caused the Debian Bug report #673649, regarding A few sparc installs with Wheezy Alpha installer to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 673649: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=673649 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: A few sparc installs with Wheezy Alpha installer
- From: Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org>
- Date: Sun, 20 May 2012 14:25:17 +0100
- Message-id: <20120520132517.GA10521@wooyd.org>
Package: installation-reports Severity: normal Hello, I ran a few installs using Wheezy Alpha on my machines (SunBlade 2000 and Sun T1000 server) over the last couple of days and it went mostly smoothly, see details below. 1. Machine: SunBlade 2000 Medium: netboot Console: serial Partitioning: guided, separate /home Result: ok 2. Machine: SunBlade 2000 Medium: netinst CD Console: serial Partitioning: guided, with LVM, separate /home Result: ok 3. Machine: SunBlade 2000 Medium: netinst CD Console: keyboard/screen Partitioning: guided, with LVM, separate partitions for /home, /var, /tmp, etc Result: ok 4. Machine: Sun T1000 server Medium: netboot (no other booting methods available) Console: via ethernet management port Partitioning: guided, with encrypted LVM, separate /home Result: ok Notes: one minor quirk is that during network hardware detection installer claims that required firmware is missing, and asks whether user wants to load tigon/tg3_tso.bin from removable medium. This server does not have any USB ports, so it would be rather tricky to deliver the firmware. Luckily, I found that if I just skip loading the firmware, the network works fine and install completes successfully. Best regards, -- Jurij Smakov jurij@wooyd.org Key: http://www.wooyd.org/pgpkey/ KeyID: C99E03CC
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 696737-done@bugs.debian.org, 607698-done@bugs.debian.org, 606496-done@bugs.debian.org, 603960-done@bugs.debian.org, 701827-done@bugs.debian.org, 686786-done@bugs.debian.org, 685681-done@bugs.debian.org, 685515-done@bugs.debian.org, 685047-done@bugs.debian.org, 685308-done@bugs.debian.org, 684639-done@bugs.debian.org, 683706-done@bugs.debian.org, 683705-done@bugs.debian.org, 683381-done@bugs.debian.org, 682753-done@bugs.debian.org, 682507-done@bugs.debian.org, 682008-done@bugs.debian.org, 680555-done@bugs.debian.org, 681673-done@bugs.debian.org, 680026-done@bugs.debian.org, 679795-done@bugs.debian.org, 675127-done@bugs.debian.org, 674855-done@bugs.debian.org, 672317-done@bugs.debian.org, 673649-done@bugs.debian.org, 605076-done@bugs.debian.org, 690752-done@bugs.debian.org, control@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dealing with old installation-reports
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 12:42:38 +0200
- Message-id: <201308251243.25305.holger@layer-acht.org>
reassign 701201 src:linux retitle 701201 libata.atapi_passthru16=0 is needed by some hardware forcemerge 690985 686954 thanks Hi, thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated. I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if - they (finally) indicated success and/or - I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in Wheezy and/or - they only contained very little information and/or - they contained user errors and/or - they were caused by broken hardware and/or - they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or - they are quite old (and thus likely fixed today) and/or - moreinfo was asked and not given. If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft. cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---