Your message dated Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:18:09 +0200 with message-id <201308251018.25686.holger@layer-acht.org> and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs has caused the Debian Bug report #594348, regarding base-installer: anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (XXX-modules/udeb/...): package doesn't exist (ignored) to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 594348: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=594348 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: base-installer: anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (XXX-modules/udeb/...): package doesn't exist (ignored)
- From: <ironmark@hispeed.ch>
- Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2010 16:01:41 +0200
- Message-id: <25798746.1282744901841.JavaMail.root@viefep13>
Subject: base-installer: anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (XXX-modules/udeb/...): package doesn't exist (ignored) Package: debian-installer Version: 20100722 Severity: important *** Please type your report below this line *** Hi, Thanks for your great programming job. Please reassign in case it is an issue of another package - thank you. When installing an debian live image to hard disk drive the installation "produce" the following error messages in the install syslog (using install from boot menu or from live mode): # --- Aug 24 11:24:32 main-menu[2345]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:52 main-menu[2345]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 main-menu[2345]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 main-menu[2345]: DEBUG: resolver (libc6-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (fat-modules): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib-modules-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (ufsutils-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (fat-modules): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (zlib-modules-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 11:24:55 anna[3469]: DEBUG: resolver (ufsutils-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (cdebconf-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (di-utils): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (kernel-image-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (core-modules-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (fat-modules): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (libdebian-installer4-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (archdetect): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:07 anna[6248]: DEBUG: resolver (hw-detect): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (cdebconf-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (di-utils): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (kernel-image-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (core-modules-2.6.32-5-amd64-di): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (fat-modules): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (libdebian-installer4-udeb): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (archdetect): package doesn't exist (ignored) Aug 24 09:27:09 anna[6342]: DEBUG: resolver (hw-detect): package doesn't exist (ignored) # --- The version 1.90 of rootskel has been used: #--- ./cache/packages_debian-installer.udeb/rootskel-bootfloppy_1.90_amd64.udeb ./cache/packages_debian-installer.udeb/rootskel_1.90_amd64.udeb ./cache/packages_debian-installer.udeb/rootskel-gtk_1.20_amd64.udeb #--- regards Mark -- System Information: Debian Release: squeeze/sid APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/1 CPU core) Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash -- no debconf information
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: control@bugs.debian.org, 573948-done@bugs.debian.org, 470144-done@bugs.debian.org, 692540-done@bugs.debian.org, 661826-done@bugs.debian.org, 627488-done@bugs.debian.org, 594348-done@bugs.debian.org, 602167-done@bugs.debian.org, 604101-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: dealing with old debian-installer bugs
- From: Holger Levsen <holger@layer-acht.org>
- Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 10:18:09 +0200
- Message-id: <201308251018.25686.holger@layer-acht.org>
reassign 421338 debian-cd retitle 421338 ia64 CDs should warn that they are not amd64 thanks Hi, thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much appreciated. I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if - they (finally) indicated success and/or - I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in Wheezy and/or - they only contained very little information and/or - they contained user errors and/or - they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or - they are very old and/or - they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to close wishlist bugs.) If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft. cheers, HolgerAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
--- End Message ---