[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#615599: marked as done (debian-installer prefers usb Blockdevices over "real" harddrives)

Your message dated Mon, 22 Jul 2013 01:12:11 +0200
with message-id <201307220112.30643.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #615599,
regarding debian-installer prefers usb Blockdevices over "real" harddrives
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
615599: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=615599
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer
Version: 20110106+b1
Tried to autoinstall squeeze on dell poweredge hardware with drac5 or idrac6 KVM. The installer always tried to use 40MB usb vflash (/dev/sda) instead of the 1tb real harddrive (/dev/sdb).
I'd suggest to give real harddrive controllers (like cciss, mptfusion, ahci, megaraid_sas) precedence over usb_storage. 

Regards Thomas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
reassign 690832 choose-mirror
reassign 687488 netcfg
retitle 709319 wheezy 7.1: scanning for more DVDs is confusing
tags 709319 + confirmed
tags 626219 + confirmed
reassign 616722 partman-md
reassign 616125 partman-crypto
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much 
appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug 
log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: