[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#647406: marked as done (please consider removing #debian-boot reference from installation guide)

Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:53:10 +0200
with message-id <201307211553.37517.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #647406,
regarding please consider removing #debian-boot reference from installation guide
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
647406: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=647406
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: debian-installer
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

Chapter 7.1 of the squeeze installation guide contains the sentence

"For direct on-line help you can try the IRC channels #debian
or #debian-boot on the OFTC network."

As the population of #debian-boot is obviously not prepared for
end-user question, #debian-boot should be clearly flagged as an
"experts only" channel, and end-users should be discouraged from
joining there.

Greetings
Marc

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
tags 697985 + moreinfo
tags 647406 + wontifx
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much 
appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug 
log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: