[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#576206: marked as done (debian-installer: [ppc] does not work with serial console)



Your message dated Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:53:10 +0200
with message-id <201307211553.37517.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old debian-installer bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #576206,
regarding debian-installer: [ppc] does not work with serial console
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
576206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=576206
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: debian-installer
Severity: normal


qemu-system-ppc -m 1024 -net nic -net
tap,ifname=tap0,script=no,downscript=nomg -cdrom
debian-504-powerpc-netinst.iso  -boot d -nographic

does not seem to do anything.

Without -nographic a prompt on yellow screen appears where you can type
something to boot an installer.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 5.0.4
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (900, 'stable'), (700, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (110, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 2.6.34-rc1-atom64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US.UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
tags 697985 + moreinfo
tags 647406 + wontifx
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting bug reports concering debian-installer, much 
appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are very old and/or
- they are wishlist but rather special + exotic and not have been acted on for 
years. (See http://blog.liw.fi/posts/wishlist-bugs/ why it's often useful to 
close wishlist bugs.)

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - and that's often better, as the bug 
log will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---

Reply to: