[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#614504: marked as done (Can't install debian 6.0 on a Dell optiplex gx110)

Your message dated Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:22:32 +0200
with message-id <201307201723.03308.holger@layer-acht.org>
and subject line dealing with old installation-reports
has caused the Debian Bug report #614504,
regarding Can't install debian 6.0 on a Dell optiplex gx110
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
614504: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=614504
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- Package: cdrom 
Version: 6.0

Neither the "install" nor the "graphical install" option works.
When I choose one of these options, the bottom of the screen gets covered with multicolored snow, and nothing else happens. 
I burned another cd, and the problem persists.

I managed to install and run Lenny on another optiplex gx110 (I gave it to a friend).
The debian 5 install process works on this computer.

I searched the web with combinations of: debian dell install squeeze gx110
I found no answer yet.

Is there a way to solve this problem ?
Thanks.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
reassign 609339 netcfg
tags 609339 + wontfix
reassign 604150 partman-partitioning
thanks

Hi,

thank you for submitting installation reports, much appreciated.

I read through all the bugs mentioned here (and I'm sure they were read by 
several people at the time they were submitted) and am closing them now as/if
- they (finally) indicated success and/or
- I know from first hand experience that the functionality is working in 
Wheezy and/or
- they only contained very little information and/or
- they contained user errors and/or
- they have been from a development phase where things were not stable and/or
- they are quite old.

If I've closed a bug incorrectly please do reply (it's easy to reopen and I'll 
do if requested) or just file a new one - thats often better, as the bug log 
will be clearer and shorter and not contain cruft.


cheers,
        Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


--- End Message ---
Reply to: