Bug#716808: Busybox is outdated

[Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>]

13.07.2013 17:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Hi Michael,
> 
> On Samstag, 13. Juli 2013, Michael Tokarev wrote:
>> Because it serves no (additional) purpose (we have a watch file
>> for that already) except of cluttering buglist (which is already
> 
> it does serve  a purpose: to express+document users needs for the new version 
> (which then is useful to priorize work etc).

Heh.  And this is exactly why I closed it: users don't need the
new version.  I especially asked Jackson which features or bugfixes
he needs.  He replied with a link to a changelog, which makes me
think that he simple does not care, so does not actually need a
new version.  And this was exactly the reason why I closed it --
because there's actually no indication that users need it.

Thanks,

/mjt