[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#233957: marked as done (neither fdisk nor cfdisk can handle a new ibm scsi disk)



Your message dated Sat, 5 Feb 2011 11:40:15 +0000
with message-id <201102051140.15797.elmig@debianpt.org>
and subject line 
has caused the Debian Bug report #233957,
regarding neither fdisk nor cfdisk can handle a new ibm scsi disk
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
233957: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=233957
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: installation-reports

Debian-installer-version: <beta2>
uname -a: <Linux herrenpfad 2.4.22-1-386 #2 SMP Fri Feb 20 21:05:14 CET 2004
i686 GNU/Linux>
Date: <19-02-2004>
Method: <Install from CD>

Machine: <ASUS P2L97-DS, ICP/Vortex 6113RS, >
Processor: dual P-III
Memory: 512 MB
Filesystem            Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part2
                      487M  117M  370M  25% /
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part5
                      3.9G  209M  3.7G   6% /usr
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part8
                      3.9G  524M  3.4G  14% /usr/src
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part6
                      3.9G   96M  3.8G   3% /var
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target0/lun0/part7
                       22G   41M   22G   1% /var/log
/dev/scsi/host0/bus0/target1/lun0/part1
                       35G   35M   35G   1% /var/spool/squid
Output of lspci:
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440LX/EX - 82443LX/EX Host bridge (rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440LX/EX - 82443LX/EX AGP bridge (rev 03)
00:04.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
00:04.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:04.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
00:04.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
00:09.0 PCI bridge: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21152 (rev 03)
00:0a.0 SCSI storage controller: ICP Vortex Computersysteme GmbH GDT
6113RS/6513RS
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11 [GeForce2 MX/MX
400] (rev b2)
02:04.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43
(rev 41)
02:05.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43
(rev 41)
02:06.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43
(rev 41)
02:07.0 Ethernet controller: Digital Equipment Corporation DECchip 21142/43
(rev 41)

Base System Installation Checklist:

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [O]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [E]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Comments/Problems:
factory-new IBM scsi disks on gdt controller.
cfdisk detected an invalid partition table.
So did fdisk on the console.
After writing a valid but empty partition
table using fdisk all went fine.

If swap is not handled first the installer incorrectly uses the last
mounting point
and consequently has a problem



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I am closing this installation report as the installer you tried is no longer 
developed. A lot as changed in the installer and the current debian-installer 
release it's now Debian Squeeze.

I invite you to try Debian Squeeze and address any issues against current 
release.

-- 
Melhores cumprimentos/Best regards,

Miguel Figueiredo
http://www.DebianPT.org


--- End Message ---

Reply to: