Matthew Palmer wrote: > [Taking this off-bug] > > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 07:36:54AM +0100, Christian PERRIER wrote: > > I indeed wonder it if would make sense to switch the i-g to git once > > it is released. > > I think it would be worthwhile -- at the moment I'm queueing up changes to > make to the manual, which just feels like it's going to end in tears. It's > not worth inconveniencing translators, though; developers can work around > the problem (yay git-svn!) if it has to be. So, the scripts don't look as bad as I'd heard. There's this in rev-check: svn diff -r $TREV:$3 ./en/$1 Here $TREV is revision the translation is indicated as being current to, and $3 is I think the current revision of the english document. That seems no problem: git diff $TREV..$3 -- ./en/$1 Then in unfuzzy-xml: svn cat -r $(($REV - 1)) en/$XML So here we have math on svn revs, but something like this would work: git checkout $REV^ cat en/$XMl git checkout master (A much smaller hammer than git checkout could be used here.) Despite talk of the manual needing a VCS with ordered revision numbers, that's the only thing I find that uses such an ordering, and git can handle the same thing using ^ as shown. -- see shy jo
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature