Re: archdetect as a .deb
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:13:35AM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 09:07, Colin Watson <cjwatson@debian.org> wrote:
> > I can't say I really want dpkg to depend on libdebian-installer. It
> > seems inappropriate. I also explicitly want the d-i team to carry on
> > maintaining that subarchitecture mapping in libdebian-installer, as it's
> > quite tightly bound into our codebase.
>
> I agree partially with it however it seems confusing to have
> dpkg-architecture and archdetect on same system.
>
> Maybe we might build a dpkg-subarchitecture package?
I'd really prefer not to have to rename all the calls to archdetect. It
also doesn't really seem appropriate to call it dpkg-* when the dpkg
team isn't primarily responsible for maintaining it.
--
Colin Watson [cjwatson@debian.org]
Reply to: