Le lundi 09 juin 2008 à 18:59 +0200, Per Olofsson a écrit :
> Eric Dorland wrote:
> > As to whether to include Iceweasel over epiphany (or whatever) in the
> > gnome task, that's probably the gnome team's call. However, Iceweasel
> > is clearly the more popular one and 3.0 does have better integration
> > with Gnome (at least look at feel wise).
>
> FWIW, Iceweasel 3.0 also incorporates some of Epiphany's features, namely
> bookmark tagging and bookmark typeahead finding from the location bar.
And still:
* it does not follow the HIG (which is, after theming and icons,
the most important thing when it comes to look and feel);
* there is no network-manager integration;
* there is no avahi integration;
* there is no support for notifications;
and I probably forget some.
There are definitely some nice improvements in iceweasel 3.0 when it
comes to GNOME integration (especially the proxy settings, the beginning
of GTK+ icon theme support and native widgets), but it still looks like
a second-class browser to me in this context.
Cheers,
--
.''`.
: :' : We are debian.org. Lower your prices, surrender your code.
`. `' We will add your hardware and software distinctiveness to
`- our own. Resistance is futile.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=