On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 22:46 +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: > > Well, my current patch is simply: > Index: kernel-versions > =================================================================== > --- kernel-versions (revision 53021) > +++ kernel-versions (working copy) > @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ > # arch version flavour installedname suffix build-depends > -i386 2.6.24-1 486 2.6.24-1-486 - linux-image-2.6.24-1-486 > +i386 2.6.25-1 486 2.6.25-1-486 - linux-image-2.6.25-1-486 > +i386 2.6.25-1 686-bigmem 2.6.25-1-686-bigmem - linux-image-2.6.25-1-686-bigmem > (plus a hacked upgrade to kernel wedge for 2.6.25) > > I could file the equivalent change but without the 24->25 bit I suppose > or I could generate what I know the patch will look like once the 24->25 > change has been made. Perhaps I should mention that the reason I'm so interested in 2.6.25 is that this is the first kernel which has the necessary Xen support, so while I could put forward patches to enable this stuff for 2.6.24 (and a netboot-bigmem image etc) I don't have a way to test. Ian. -- Ian Campbell Hearts will never be practical until they can be made unbreakable. -- The Wizard of Oz
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part