On Sunday 23 December 2007, Colin Watson wrote: > All that's required for that, IMO, is for the new di-utils to propagate > to testing before any dependent changes are made elsewhere. (Though > versioned dependencies are a useful record, and don't have a huge cost; > unlikely to consume more than a kilobyte uncompressed, I'd expect, which > seems well worth it for their mnemonic value.) Sure. I see that di-utils is already included in pkg-lists/base, so deps are not strictly necessary. How about dropping really ancient versioned deps (e.g. older than the version in stable) at some point?
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.