Bug#242256: marked as done ([i386 [beta3] [netinst] success)
Your message dated Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:11:06 +0200
with message-id <200408031811.11557.frederik@dannemare.net>
and subject line Processed: Bug#242256: success
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 5 Apr 2004 15:45:42 +0000
>From P.vdSpoel@cetis.hvu.nl Mon Apr 05 08:45:42 2004
Return-path: <P.vdSpoel@cetis.hvu.nl>
Received: from makepeace.hvu.nl [145.89.38.8]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BAWIA-0003Uw-00; Mon, 05 Apr 2004 08:45:42 -0700
Received: from mailhvu.hvu.nl (mailhvu.hvu.nl [145.89.32.10])
by makepeace.hvu.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DF31A4310
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:45:38 +0200 (MEST)
Received: by mailhvu.hvu.nl with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
id <H7F5YL8S>; Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:45:41 +0200
Message-ID: <A7B8B3354A3937458F3441CDB82D90E4023E01D2@mailhvu.hvu.nl>
From: Pete van der Spoel <P.vdSpoel@cetis.hvu.nl>
To: "'submit@bugs.debian.org '" <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: Package: installation-reports
Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:45:35 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
Content-Type: text/plain
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Scores: 1
Package: installation-reports
Debian-installer-version:
http://gluck.debian.org/cdimage/testing/sarge_d-i/i386/beta3/sarge-i386-neti
nst.iso
uname -a: Linux sarge 2.4.25-1-386 #1 Tue Feb 24 08:11:13 EST 2004 i686
GNU/Linux
Date: 20040402 16:42 CEST
Method: CD install with above .iso
Machine: Compaq Deskpro
Processor: P3 600MHz
Memory: 196 MB
Root Device: IDE0
Root Size/partition table: 9.5 GB everything in one dir with 0.5 GB swap
Output of lspci: sarge:/home/pete# lspci
00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX Host bridge
(rev 03)
00:01.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corp. 440BX/ZX/DX - 82443BX/ZX/DX AGP bridge (rev
03)
00:0f.0 Ethernet controller: 3Com Corporation 3c905 100BaseTX [Boomerang]
00:14.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ISA (rev 02)
00:14.1 IDE interface: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 IDE (rev 01)
00:14.2 USB Controller: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 USB (rev 01)
00:14.3 Bridge: Intel Corp. 82371AB/EB/MB PIIX4 ACPI (rev 02)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc 3D Rage Pro AGP
1X/2X (rev 5c)
Base System Installation Checklist:
Initial boot worked: [o ]
Configure network HW: [o ]
Config network: [o ]
Detect CD: [o ]
Load installer modules: [o ]
Detect hard drives: [o ]
Partition hard drives: [o ]
Create file systems: [o ]
Mount partitions: [o ]
Install base system: [o ]
Install boot loader: [o ]
Reboot: [o ]
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it
Comments/Problems:
Everything went fine, although I used mainly default options. Only a minor
point: if you configure exim for local mail only then you are still asked
about the popularity-contest, which is then presumably unable to deliver
it's mail.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 242256-done) by bugs.debian.org; 3 Aug 2004 16:09:42 +0000
>From frederik@dannemare.net Tue Aug 03 09:09:42 2004
Return-path: <frederik@dannemare.net>
Received: from cpe.atm0-0-0-2421032.0x3ef2dbfa.arcnxx7.customer.tele.dk (host.kl-teknik.com) [62.242.219.250]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bs1rB-0001de-00; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 09:09:42 -0700
Received: from mail.thepenguininvasion.dk (0x5358aaae.abnxx12.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk [::ffff:83.88.170.174])
(AUTH: PLAIN admin@sentinel.dk)
by host.kl-teknik.com with esmtp; Tue, 03 Aug 2004 18:14:49 +0200
id 000230A2.410FB9F9.0000361E
From: Frederik Dannemare <frederik@dannemare.net>
To: 242256-done@bugs.debian.org,
Pete van der Spoel <P.vdSpoel@cetis.hvu.nl>
Subject: Processed: Bug#242256: success
Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2004 18:11:06 +0200
User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2
Cc: frederik@dannemare.net
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: Text/Plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <200408031811.11557.frederik@dannemare.net>
Delivered-To: 242256-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
first and foremost: thank you for your bug report.
<http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D242256>
I'm currently processing old installation reports, and since you
had a successful installation, I will close this report. I believe the=20
thing you mention regarding popcon and exim and is no longer present.
=46eel free to try the most current cd image
from http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/daily/ and report
any issues you may encounter.
Thanks,
=2D --=20
=46rederik Dannemare | mailto:frederik@dannemare.net
GnuPG key: search for 'dannemare' on http://pgpkeys.mit.edu
Key fingerprint: BB7B 078A 0DBF 7663 180A F84A 2D25 FAD5 9C4E B5A8
http://frederik.dannemare.net | http://www.linuxworlddomination.dk
=2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBD7kcLSX61ZxOtagRApjiAJ9WqTuxmLSxu8I+LDq2kJgmMIGi+gCgnb6y
XUWt7I0mrnFC0GGaQwZJrUg=3D
=3D4ahd
=2D----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: