[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#261371: install report: amd64 works ok



Package: installation-reports

INSTALL REPORT

Debian-installer-version: 20040724 daily build from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/install-images
uname -a: Linux carrington 2.6.7-5-amd64-xeon #1 SMP Thu Jul 15 00:27:37 CEST 2004 x86_64 GNU/Linux
Date: 20040725
Method: A netboot install from debian-amd64.alioth.debian.org/pure64/. No proxy.

Machine: Homebrew based on an Asus K8V SE deluxe mobo
Processor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Memory: 512MB
Root Device: hde6
Root Size/partition table:
   hde1		ntfs	40G	win xp
   hde3		ext3	20G	debian i386
   hde4		ext3	4G	debian i386
   hde6		ext3	4G	debian amd64	/
   hde5		lvm	125G
   	1 music	xfs	60G
	2 home	xfs	45G	/home
	3 opt	xfs	10G	/chroot
	4 swap			swap

Output of lspci and lspci -n:

Base System Installation Checklist:
[O] = OK, [E] = Error (please elaborate below), [ ] = didn't try it

Initial boot worked:    [O]
Configure network HW:   [O]
Config network:         [O]
Detect CD:              [ ]
Load installer modules: [O]
Detect hard drives:     [O]
Partition hard drives:  [O]
Create file systems:    [O]
Mount partitions:       [O]
Install base system:    [O]
Install boot loader:    [O]
Reboot:                 [O]

Comments/Problems:

The install went ok. There are two points I do want to note however.

First, the windows partition wasn't detected by os-prober. A previous
install with a i386 d-i image did find it. Most likely caused by the
ntfs module being absent.

Second, although I have an AMD cpu d-i installed an Intel Xeon kernel-image.
It does boot and seems to be working good enough to install an k8
kernel-image.
In the logs I found a note that the installer didn't know what the amd64
architecture was and it looked like it just defaulted to the first
non-netboot kernel it could find.

regards,
Thomas
-- 

	Human civilization is not something achieved against nature; it is
	rather the outcome of the working of the innate qualities of man.
	 -- Ludwig von Mises




Reply to: