Re: Debconf vs. graphical installer
* Sebastian Ley
| The more I think of it, the more I start to dislike it ;-) Imagine how
| much work it really is to do such a thing. There must be
| #udebs x #frontends of custom widgets. If a change in the module
| involves a change in the UI, all frontend widgets must be changed. I
| don't know if that is feasable...
Why do you think each and every udeb needs a custom widget? The only
one which really needs it is the partitioner, IMHO. Adding good
support for grouping questions would, for instance, make netcfg-static
not suck the way it does today.
--
Tollef Fog Heen ,''`.
UNIX is user friendly, it's just picky about who its friends are : :' :
`. `'
`-
Reply to: