Re: Bug#31799: boot-floppies: undeclared dependency on debiandoc-sgml
In message <m101GxB-0006NHC@vanzandt.mv.com> you wrote:
>>It *is* a versioned depends, but the documentation type dependancies
>>are listed as 'recommends', not 'depends'. It's not my fault that
>>apt-get ignores that stuff.
>
>I suppose it's partly my fault for using just dpkg to install everything.
>
>>If you really think the documentation dependancies should be 'depends'
>>instead of 'recommends', let us know (maybe another bug?).
>
>I was not able to create a set of installation files until I had
>satisfied these dependencies. I would say that, for practical
>purposes, "depends" is more accurate.
I don't disagree.
I'll go ahead and change it in cvs. If Enrique disagrees with that,
he can fold back a rev.
--
.....A. P. Harris...apharris@onShore.com...<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: