Bug#39190: marked as done (base: true is a 395 byte shell script.)
Your message dated 30 Oct 1999 21:28:12 -0400
with message-id <oar9icnwsz.fsf@burrito.onshore.com>
and subject line Updates to ash and busybox
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Darren Benham
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Jun 1999 00:13:46 +0000
Received: (qmail 1055 invoked from network); 9 Jun 1999 00:13:45 -0000
Received: from beavis.alleged.com (mail@207.109.213.46)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 9 Jun 1999 00:13:45 -0000
Received: from cheako by Beavis.Alleged.com with local (Exim 2.05 #1 (Debian))
id 10rW00-00005Q-00; Tue, 8 Jun 1999 19:13:44 -0500
From: <cheako@Beavis.Alleged.com>
Subject: base: true is a 395 byte shell script.
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.1.7
Message-Id: <E10rW00-00005Q-00@Beavis.Alleged.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 1999 19:13:44 -0500
Package: base
Version: N/A
maby it should be done in asm?
-- System Information
Debian Release: 2.1
Kernel Version: Linux Beavis 2.0.36 #2 Sun Feb 21 15:55:27 EST 1999 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 39190-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 Oct 1999 01:27:31 +0000
Received: (qmail 6284 invoked from network); 31 Oct 1999 01:27:30 -0000
Received: from arcts2p115.port.net (HELO arroz.fake) (@207.237.111.115)
by master.debian.org with SMTP; 31 Oct 1999 01:27:30 -0000
Received: by arroz.fake (Postfix, from userid 421)
id 1E9B693802; Sat, 30 Oct 1999 21:28:13 -0400 (EDT)
Sender: apharris@burrito.onshore.com
To: Raul Miller <moth@debian.org>
Cc: andersen@xmission.com, 39190-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Updates to ash and busybox
References: <19990924112619.B1634@xmission.com> <oapuz7vcx1.fsf@burrito.onshore.com> <19990924224748.B483@xmission.com> <oawvtftvpx.fsf@burrito.onshore.com> <[🔎] 19991018225709.A2642@xmission.com> <[🔎] oahfjnkhqa.fsf@burrito.onshore.com> <[🔎] 19991019005349.A7527@xmission.com> <[🔎] 19991019071127.71AFD93802@arroz.fake> <[🔎] 19991023150623.F26033@usatoday.com>
From: Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com>
Date: 30 Oct 1999 21:28:12 -0400
In-Reply-To: Raul Miller's message of "Sat, 23 Oct 1999 15:06:23 -0400"
Message-ID: <oar9icnwsz.fsf@burrito.onshore.com>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.070096 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.96) Emacs/20.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Raul Miller <moth@debian.org> writes:
> Near as I can tell, 39190 doesn't even address this issue.
>
> However, we're talking about the difference between a block on disk and
> a directory entry vs. linkage and table storage with whatever overhead
> is required for a trivial subroutine.
>
> This comes down to implementation specific issues...
Quite right. I'm closing the bug. We all have bigger fish to fry,
anyhow.
--
.....Adam Di Carlo....adam@onShore.com.....<URL:http://www.onShore.com/>
Reply to: