lör 2003-03-22 klockan 02.03 skrev Herbert Xu: > Martin Sj?gren <md9ms@mdstud.chalmers.se> wrote: > > > > I have thus written the following, and checked it into the d-i cvs as > > doc/kernel-modules.txt, or in viewcvs: > > http://cvs.debian.org/*checkout*/debian-installer/doc/kernel-modules.txt?rev=1.1 > > > > Any comments on this? > > Why can't we simply use the package name for that? Every kernel modules > package should carry the version number in its name. It's harder to parse. I don't want anna to screw up because someone named their udeb a bit weird. The pattern for kernel module udebs so far seem to be on the form *-modules-*.*.*-*-udeb which is a bit too unclear for my taste :/ Having a special control field is simple to use and feels like a more solid solution. If too many are against it, though, I guess I'll try to use the package names instead. /Martin -- Martin Sjögren sjogren@debian.org -- marvin@dum.chalmers.se GPG key: http://www.mdstud.chalmers.se/~md9ms/gpg.html let hello = "hello" : hello in putStr (unlines hello)
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel