fre 2002-11-22 klockan 17.02 skrev Denis Barbier: > Hi, > > debconf makes a difference between no value and an empty value. > In order for cdebconf to have the same behaviour, question_get_field > must return NULL if the requested field does not exist, which breaks > many things because it is supposed to return a pointer to a string. > May I perform all the necessary changes, and potentiolly cause some > sigsegv if a return address is kept untested? I for one would be very happy to see the distinction no value != empty value. In fact, I've been pondering how to detect the "no value" case :) I'd say go ahead, the errors are probably easy to find and fix. /Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Detta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E4r?= en digitalt signerad meddelandedel