Re: Kernel for woody

[Brian Mays <brian@debian.org>]

David Whedon <dwhedon@gordian.com> wrote:

> new (untested) versions:
    ...
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-compact_3.1.22-0.2potatok1_i386.deb
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-ide_3.1.22-0.2potatok1_i386.deb
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17-idepci_3.1.22-0.2potatok1_i386.deb
> pcmcia-modules-2.2.19pre17_3.1.22-0.2potatok1_i386.deb

Good.  Looking at the file namse, I can tell that you built these
packages successfully.  They will not have the Conflicts problems that
the previous packages had.

    [...]

> Nobody addressed the tiny header patch in :
> http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0103/msg00334.html
>
> So I guess it is ok as is, it is applied since we can't build
> 2.2.19pre17 without it.

That sounds okay to me.

> I'll upload these if I hear soon that it is okay with you, Brian, or
> you can upload them yourself, sort of like sponsoring me, right?  It
> might get in faster if someone else uploaded them since I may not have
> any more time over the next week.

I'll upload the packages for you if someone will double check that
the PCMCIA modules actually work with the kernel package.  You'd be
surprised at the number of times that I have built a pcmcia-modules
package with unresolved symbols.  It is tricky.

Thanks,

- Brian