Re: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"

To: Debian Beowulf <debian-beowulf@lists.debian.org>, David Dussault <dussault@lyre.mit.edu>
Subject: Re: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:14:59 -0500
Message-id: <[🔎] 3A8BF273.C5254180@mit.edu>
References: <[🔎] 3A8AFECB.F9E8B931@mit.edu>

Oops, Netscape's HTML-to-text converter didn't do a real good job with the table:

Adam C Powell IV wrote:

>                               # Procs  mpich  lam
>                               "0"      88.26  88.53
>                               1        89.26  90.31
>                               2        53.89  56.15
>                               4        22.65  22.71

Zeen,

-Adam P.

GPG fingerprint: D54D 1AEE B11C CE9B A02B  C5DD 526F 01E8 564E E4B6

              Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
  - From: Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp>

References:
- PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
  - From: Adam C Powell IV <hazelsct@mit.edu>

Prev by Date: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
Next by Date: Re: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
Previous by thread: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
Next by thread: Re: PETSc mpich and lam "benchmarks"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread