Re: MOSIX
"Marcelo E. Magallon" wrote:
>
...
> and it's in general a PITA to work with because of
> the way the process migration is envisioned by the MOSIX developers.
Can you explain a bit more ??
...
> If you check WNPP you'll see there's no entry for MOSIX. I really don't want to
> discourage anyone else from starting this work.
What's that (WNPP) ??
...
> Some stuff will change for 2.4: versionate will be a thing of the
> past (yay!), it sounds like it would not be so version specific, and
> in general it might be better.
Lot's of nice surprises whith kernel 2.4 ;-)
> > Something to look for would be compatibility with current kernel
> > versions I guess. Do patches work all right for 2.2.14, etc?
>
> AFAIK, they do. They should work with 2.2.15 and 2.2.16, too.
Not completely, work with 2.2.15 but doesn't compil with 2.2.16 AND
gcc-2.95.2-12 (last night tests). The answer from Ariel Eizenberg from
the mosix team :
"MOSIX compiles flawlessly with gcc 2.7.2 and egcs 1.1.2 (gcc-2.91)."
Some other guy has the same pb (debian 2.2, gcc-2.95.2) and swapping to
2.7.2 solve it.
>
> > Except that, I think it would be like a kernel patch package, a
> > package for userland stuff, and a development package.
>
> Yes, that sounds about right. There's also the file system and the
> (I beleive not yet released) shared memory thing, which might need of
> some extra packaging depending on how it's implemented.
>
> > That might not be quite the right path to hook up a distributed OS
> > anyway :) Seriously, I'm on the side of free software and MOSIX
> > guys seem to have made some progress recently. But I'm not that
> > sure how the Beowulf community takes MOSIX.
>
> The beowulf community? What's that? h/j.
Doesn't know that either ... And what's that stuff on free software and
MOSIX ???
>From what I've seen in the last version (Mosix-0.97.6), every thing is
GPLed ...
It seems to be "free" enough for me.
>
> Seriously, MOSIX is a good thing if you pay attention to what you are
> doing (here I must say that I did have MOSIX running on a Debian
> cluster, that is, until I moved and the cluster had to stay behind),
> and it's relative easy to take advantage of once you understand what
> it does and what it doesn't, why and how.
We did run a mosix cluster on 12 pII (debian slink/potato) last summer,
and it ran
pretty well.
I'm playing with a 2/3 nodes cluster from time to time at home. Until
that last release,
I didn't have much problems.
...
Regards,
F. Lorrain
Reply to:
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: MOSIX
- From: Eray Ozkural <exa@ttnet.net.tr>
- Re: MOSIX
- From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>
- References:
- MOSIX
- From: Barak Pearlmutter <bap@cs.unm.edu>
- Re: MOSIX
- From: Eray Ozkural <exa@ttnet.net.tr>
- Re: MOSIX
- From: "Marcelo E. Magallon" <mmagallo@debian.org>