On 2016-10-12 18:57 +0100, Wookey wrote: > On 2016-10-11 08:16 +0200, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote: > > > > Seems to me that the issue is probably actually in gdal, rather > > > than postgis, although why the configure behaviour has changd > > > remains a mystery. > > > > The configure behaviour is weird indeed. On the other architectures > > "none required" remains the result for this test. > > I looked at the actual configure stuff for this and couldn't really > grok when that came out as the result. > > > The CryptoPP symbols seem to have changed with the recent update of > > libcrypto++ from 5.6.3-8 to 5.6.4-1. Which did not create this problem > > on the other architectures though. > > > > Perhaps rebuilding gdal with the new libcrypto++ on arm64 will be > > sufficient to fix this issue? > > That seems quite likely. It might just be the senstivity of C++ > symbols to compiler changes. Unfortunately so far as I know one can't > test such a thing on the porter boxes (because there is no way to > unstall the local gdal you just built due to lack of root rights). > > So I have got my local arm64 box going again and will test this theory > tomorrow (home time now). OK. Yep, just rebuilding gdal (and installing the resulting libgdal-dev, libgdal20), fixes the postgis configure. I'll schedule a binNMU. Wookey -- Principal hats: Linaro, Debian, Wookware, ARM http://wookware.org/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature