Re: Re: Re: [Reproducible-builds] Raspi 3 suitable for arm64
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Steve McIntyre wrote:
> That's fine, of course! It's not like I'm advocating *against* Free
> Software here. But AFAICS the main reason why people have suggested
> the "replace the godawful forked vendor-provided U-Boot" process in
> the past is pragmatism in terms of getting systems that will work at
> all sensibly for users. With much better firmware available on better
> systems, there isn't the same drive: in fact pushing to replace it
> will make things harder for our users.
In summary, in both cases what works most easily was being advocated
for rather than the FLOSS solution.
--
bye,
pabs
https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Reply to: