[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: anyone interested in grouping together to get better pricing than $130 on ARM 7in Netbooks?



Hello,

Am 2010-01-30 21:23:37, schrieb Martin Guy:
> >   i just wish these manufacturers would get their act together and
> >  produce 9in and 10in ARM netbooks.  there seems to be some sort of
> >  mis-match (of their own expectations) that a 600 or 700mhz ARM CPU
> >  somehow wouldn't be "good enough" to run a 1024x600 or 1280x800 LCD,
> 
> It's not a CPU performance issue, but about reducing the cost of the
> components; the physical display panel is a pricey item; board, chips,
> sockets and assembly can be done fairly cheaply. Remember the early
> home micros, when the priciest item on the list was the keyboard? :)

True, I have recently bought a caton of 50 TFT Displays and payed 22 US$.
The 5"7 Where 26 US$ and the 8" 65 US$.  The 10"4 cost 86 US$.

IF you can read german go to the Website
    <http://www.mikrocontroller.net/>

and search for Michelle and the Topic "SAMMELBESTELLUNG" in the  "Markt"
Forum...

For those under you, who build there own ARM based Computers,  the  next
collectiv order will be on 2010-02-21 after the chinese Holidays  and  I
send to ALL EU countries plus Swiss.

Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening
    Michelle Konzack
    Systemadministrator
    Electronic Engineer
    Tamay Dogan Network
    Debian GNU/Linux Consultant

-- 
Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/
##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant #####################
<http://www.tamay-dogan.net/>                 Michelle Konzack
<http://www.can4linux.org/>                   Apt. 917
<http://www.flexray4linux.org/>               50, rue de Soultz
Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de           67100 Strabourg/France
IRC    #Debian (irc.icq.com)                  Tel. DE: +49 177 9351947
ICQ    #328449886                             Tel. FR: +33  6  61925193

Attachment: signature.pgp
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: