Bug#188484: marked as done (doc-central fails)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:59:43 +0000
with message-id <20040216095943.GC601@mirror.positive-internet.com>
and subject line Should Debian bug 188484 (Apache2) be closed ?
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Apr 2003 17:39:35 +0000
>From edward@debian.org Thu Apr 10 12:39:34 2003
Return-path: <edward@debian.org>
Received: from hades.robster.org.uk (hades.evilgeniuses.org.uk) [212.111.35.118]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 193g1N-0007GG-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:39:34 -0500
Received: from asquare.flatland (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hades.evilgeniuses.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 3A7F153873; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:39:31 +0100 (BST)
Received: from edward by asquare.flatland with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 193g0i-0008Mg-00; Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:38:52 +0100
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:38:52 +0100
From: Edward Betts <edward@debian.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: doc-central fails
Message-ID: <20030410173852.GA32078@traveltek.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 2.10.1
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,SIGNATURE_SHORT_DENSE,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,
USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.44
X-Spam-Level:
Package: apache2
Version: 2.0.45-2
Severity: minor
/usr/share/doc/doc-central/README says:
> Quick start: run "doccentral" or point your webbrowser to
> http://localhost/dc/ .
This does not work in apache2 because it is looking in
/var/www/apache2-default/dc/ instead of /var/www/dc/
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux asquare.flatland 2.4.21-pre6 #1 Wed Apr 2 12:31:13 BST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=en_GB, LC_CTYPE=en_GB (ignored: LC_ALL set)
--
this is not an exit
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 188484-done) by bugs.debian.org; 16 Feb 2004 09:59:45 +0000
>From thom@debian.org Mon Feb 16 01:59:45 2004
Return-path: <thom@debian.org>
Received: from mirror.positive-internet.com [80.87.128.67] (postfix)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1AsfXV-0006xR-00; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 01:59:45 -0800
Received: by mirror.positive-internet.com (Postfix, from userid 1002)
id D5B2742FFA; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:59:43 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:59:43 +0000
From: Thom May <thom@debian.org>
To: Frederic Schutz <schutz@mathgen.ch>
Cc: 188484-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Should Debian bug 188484 (Apache2) be closed ?
Message-ID: <20040216095943.GC601@mirror.positive-internet.com>
References: <[🔎] 1076895465.40301ee92aece@mail.hebweb.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 1076895465.40301ee92aece@mail.hebweb.net>
X-Operating-System: Linux/2.6.2-1-686 (i686)
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Delivered-To: 188484-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=none autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_12
X-Spam-Level:
* Frederic Schutz (schutz@mathgen.ch) wrote :
> Hi Thom,
>
> while looking for something else, I noticed bug 188484 that you tagged
> 'pending'. It seems to me that the bug is a duplicate of 160366 and 222552,
> which you closed by uploading 2.0.48-5, and should have been closed at the
> same time. Shouldn't it be closed now ?
>
Uh, yeah. Thanks :-)
-Thom
Reply to: