On Thu, 21 Jul 2005, Erik Mouw wrote:
Thanks very much for the clarification Erik! That's exactly what I wanted to answer and btw. the sig11 FAQ ist of course the source for the ramtest shell script I use.On Wed, Jul 20, 2005 at 11:32:33PM -0700, Juan Ortega wrote:Why dont you simply use memtest86?Because memtest86 doesn't catch all memory errors, while a kernel compile stresses the system in ways memtest86 doesn't. Some memory errors only happen when there is IO going on at the same time, which is exactly what a kernel compile does. For more information, see the sig11 FAQ at http://www.bitwizard.nl/sig11/ .
Regards Matthias Wenthe