Re: Kernel BUG at lib/radix-tree.c:347
On Thu, Nov 24, 2005 at 10:17:52AM -0800, Alex Malinovich wrote:
> I'm getting frequent (daily) hangs with my PC running 2.6.14 on AMD64.
> Every time the problem comes up I get the error below.
>
> For a bit of background here, I had tried 2.6.11 and 2.6.12 previously
> and had this same problem (with a different line number shown for
> radix-tree.c). I reverted to 2.6.8 with the old udev, and everything was
> fine. Once 2.6.14 came out I decided to give it another shot. While it
> has been behaving much better than .11 and .12 did, I'm still having to
> put up with kernel crashes.
>
> I have also run .11 and .12 (but not .14) in my i386 install on this
> same machine and I have had no problems.
>
> Any suggestions?
>
>
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: ----------- [cut here ] --------- [please bite here ] ---------
snip
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: Pid: 142, comm: pdflush Tainted: P 2.6.14-2-amd64-k8 #1
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: RIP: 0010:[radix_tree_tag_set+111/160] <ffffffff801de88f>{radix_tree_tag_set+111}
snip
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: Call Trace:<ffffffff8015be35>{__set_page_dirty_nobuffers+181} <ffffffff8805ef3e>{:reiserfs:do_journal_end+2094}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff8015c2b0>{pdflush+0} <ffffffff8015c2b0>{pdflush+0}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff8804d30b>{:reiserfs:reiserfs_sync_fs+59} <ffffffff8017bd20>{sync_supers+128}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff8015b9da>{wb_kupdate+42} <ffffffff8015c2b0>{pdflush+0}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff8015c3ba>{pdflush+266} <ffffffff8015b9b0>{wb_kupdate+0}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff801460ed>{kthread+205} <ffffffff8010f402>{child_rip+8}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff80145ec0>{keventd_create_kthread+0} <ffffffff80146020>{kthread+0}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: <ffffffff8010f3fa>{child_rip+0}
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel:
> Nov 23 21:08:37 localhost kernel: Code: 0f 0b 68 a0 72 30 80 c2 5b 01 66 66 66 90 66 66 90 41 ff c3
I believe this is a know bug in reiserfs. Try XFS, JFS or ext3. I
suspect you will see the problem disappear.
Cheers,
a
Reply to: