Re: Rebuild of the libqt3.

[Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>]

Hi all,

Can we mark some packages as "broken by compiler" so when a new version 
of the compiler reaches the archive we can recompile them and see if the 
problem was fixed?

Some candidates:
 libqt3 (already being handled)
 cvs (just guessing here, but it works if compiled with 3.4)
 python2.3 (see a post by me from two days ago for a detailed 
explanation of (one of?) the problem)
 xfree86 (based on a post by Andreas)

Thanks,

seb@frankengul.org wrote:
> Againt miscompilation of this package , it must be treaten as if there 
> was code broken since the package makes major packages unusable 
> (everything that depends on libqt3, quite a lot of packages to my opinion).
>
> Something like libqt3-3.3.3-8.0.0.1.1,
> with changelog:
> fix bad generation of the package.
>
> Don't know why it should be treaten differently as a bug (it is a bug).
--
Javier Kohen <jkohen@fibertel.com.ar>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org

--
Javier Kohen <jkohen@users.sourceforge.net>
ICQ: blashyrkh #2361802
Jabber: jkohen@jabber.org