Re: Requalification of Alpha for etch

[Tom Evans <tom@23palmer.net>]

If any of the buildd's are (or were) hosted in the 
Boston/Cambridge/Eastern Massachustts, USA
area, I would be happy to volunteer to serve as an admin for them.

Debian also seems very particular about the class of machines they seek.

(I also didn't know that I could "promote" alpha by running a package!).

...tom


Thimo Neubauer wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Sat, Oct 08, 2005 at 07:40:15PM +0200, Falk Hueffner wrote:
>  
>
> > * More developers need to certify in that they're activly developing
> >  on this architecture.
> >    
>
> Added myself.
>
>  
>
> > * There needs to be another buildd. There have been numerous offers in
> >  the past. I have no idea what to do to actually make it happen.
> >    
>
> The problem, I guess, is more the hosting in a place with an
> Alpha-knowledgable local admin than the machines. A good example is
> faure and lully: the local admin doesn't know SRM and therefore faure
> vanished a long while ago after a new kernel had to be installed...
>
> Cheers
>   Thimo
>
>
>