Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]

To: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>
Cc: debian-alpha@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
From: "Christopher C. Chimelis" <chris@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Oct 2000 01:21:22 -0400 (EDT)
Message-id: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0010080120030.16791-100000@spawn.hockeyfiend.com>
In-reply-to: <20001007222234.C2875@cistron.nl>

On Sat, 7 Oct 2000, Wichert Akkerman wrote:

> Looks like somebody messed up badly.. can someone do a binary-only NMU?

Ugh...not again.  Can we make updates a distinct version so I don't
compile them on a woody system?

Speaking of which, I don't even have a potato system at this
point...what's the status of the Debian-hosted alphas?

C

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>

References:
- [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
  - From: Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>

Prev by Date: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
Next by Date: X4.0.1 woes
Previous by thread: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
Next by thread: Re: [jamie@audible.transient.net: Bug#74224: 3.1.8 in proposed-updates depends on unstable libc (alpha)]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread