Re: Has anyone run Compaq C++ on Debian Alpha?
On Mon, 10 Apr 2000, Mitsuru Oka wrote:
> I found a bug as following:
>
> --- binutils-2.9.5.0.31.orig/ld/lexsup.c
> +++ binutils-2.9.5.0.31/ld/lexsup.c
> @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@
> '\0', N_("COUNT"), N_("Split output sections every COUNT relocs"), TWO_DA
> SHES },
> { {"stats", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_STATS},
> '\0', NULL, N_("Print memory usage statistics"), TWO_DASHES },
> - { {"style", no_argument, NULL, OPTION_STYLE},
> + { {"style", required_argument, NULL, OPTION_STYLE},
> '\0', "{gnu,lucid,arm,hp,edg,gnat,compaq}", N_("Set demangling style"), T
> WO_DASHES },
> { {"task-link", required_argument, NULL, OPTION_TASK_LINK},
> '\0', N_("SYMBOL"), N_("Do task level linking"), TWO_DASHES },
>
>
> I tried to rebuild of binutils package,
> install it, then Compaq C++ compiler works well now!
Ah, fantastic. I'll have to see if there was a patch to the binutils tree
upstream that did this and why it was done before patching our
binutils. It's possible that this was done on purpose for one reason or
another...
C
Reply to: