Re: SRM vs ARC
On Wed, Jan 27, 1999 at 01:00:59AM -0800, Oscar Levi wrote:
> I, also, prefer SRM. Because it boots much faster than MILO and
> because it doesn't have the irritating problem recognizing available
> memory that MILO has.
It recognizes memory just fine when booted from ARC.
> I'd not heard about the memory footprint issue. Can you quantify it?
> Is this the loss of some memory when the system is running?
Yes, and the loss is around a megabyte or 1.5 megabytes if I recall
correctly.
Jeff
Reply to: