On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 10:32:04AM +1000, fthain@telegraphics.com.au wrote: > > On Sat, 10 Apr 2010, Thorsten Glaser wrote: > > > Dixi quod > > > > >Second, I'm in the process of trying to build either gcc-4.4 > > > > Ugh, it needs newer binutils. I'm not going to do that, I leave that to > > the experts. > > I think sid binutils is available. Stephen? I'm slowly working on an etch-based sid chroot. I just synced my packages out to [0]. binutils_2.20-6 is there. That was one of the easy ones. :-) [0] http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/etch-sid [1] deb http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/etch-sid/lenny ./ [2] deb http://people.debian.org/~smarenka/m68k/etch-sid/sid ./ I'm not inclined to upload these directly to sid, since they were built in a seriously tainted chroot and I had to do some odd things to some of them. That said, I think they're fine for bootstrapping other packages. > I didn't need 4.3 in order to build a gcc 4.4 cross compiler. But there > are plenty of deps for debian sid gcc and eglibc so native packages may be > another story. Seriously painful. Peace, Stephen -- Stephen R. Marenka If life's not fun, you're not doing it right! <stephen@marenka.net>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature