Re: Kernel 2.3.39 and GCC 2.95
On Sun, Jan 23, 2000 at 12:38:37AM +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
>
> I tried to compile kernels 2.0.36 and 2.2.10 with gcc 2.95 and had
well, Jes nearly lynched me when I said I wanted to build 2.2.10 with
gcc2.95... if you want help (from Jes), use gcc272.
> problems.. Then somebody wrote that there are patches for kernel-source but
> where they are (I don't had that letters - small disc crash).
Install kernel-patch-2.2.10-m68k and apply the patch (gcc295x), the others,
esp m68klinux, should be allready applied or be available in the
kernel-patch archive.
> Few days ago somebody on irc said that kernels 2.3.xx should compile
> with gcc 2.95 without any problems. So I tried..
should, yes. Did you try with gcc272? Does it work with gcc272?
> kernel-2.3.39 from sunsite.auc.dk (m68k version of course)
That one is brandnew, AFAIK. I did not try it yet, but didn´t Jes say:
This version is likely to be buggy, but at least I think it is better
than the horrible 2.3.28 release.
when he announced it? So why do you wonder, when you hit a problem?
> *Argh......*
Well, send this to the correct mailing list, the kernel list, aka
<linux-m68k@lists.linux-m68k.org>.
debian-68k is for problems with debian on m68k machines.
linux-m68k is for problems with linux on m68k machines, especially with the
kernel. Most of the kernel hackers _only_ read linux-m68k, many of them dont
even use debian. Maybe there is allready a patch for your problem? And if
not, maybe you send a patch...
PS can somebody check this for undestandibility? I wrote this before today
and was misundestood ,it seems. What am I saying wrong?
--
Christian
Reply to: