[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#780462: summit.debian.org: T-Shirt sizes uses (e.g.) "large" vs "female large"



On 14 Mar 2015, at 16:47, Brian Gupta <brian.gupta@brandorr.com> wrote:
> 
> On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 8:45 AM, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
>> Package: summit.debconf.org
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> The T-shirt sizes field in the registration field gives the following
>> options:
>> 
>> * Small ... Extra extra large
>> * Female small ... Female extra extra large
>> * No shirt selected
>> 
>> I suspect this would be more gender neutral if we had "Male small
>> ... Male extra extra large" in the first group.
>> 
>> ~Niels
> 
> In US English (not sure about UK), it would be more natural to say
> Men's and Women's sizes instead of (fe)male sizes. I personally
> believe that it also makes it clear that we are talking about adult
> sizes.
> 
> e.g. - Women's small.

I’m not sure. We used this for many DebConf, and IIRC the T-shirt cuts could be normal (stricter form of a T) of female cut.  Women choose on of the two cuts.
[Really men choose mainly the normal cut (but few very small for their children [my assumption] and women choose female or normal cut (plus also sometime the very small).]

But i’m not an expert, so I’ll ask both about perception of “<none>/female” and how to formulate better. the sizes, without forcing women to choose female cuts.

About the sizes: I’ll ask what size our provider could provvide and adapt. [we had very strong limitation of models, in order to have the exact same colours on all t-shirts].

cate

Reply to: