[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: problems with growisofs on Fedora 1.0



Laurens,

Thanks for the blazing-fast response and the informative link.  I have not
seen that information before.

I actually created ISOs big enough to fill every byte of the DVD, so that
I would avoid any end-of-media issues (not that I actually would, but I
tried to).  It looks like my problems were caused by bad media, and just
happened to coincide with my upgrade.  I issued a retraction to the
'cdwrite' mailing list.

Thanks, again.
Maciek Kozyrczak


> On Sat 8 November 2003 22:22, Maciek Kozyrczak wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I am wondering if any 'growisofs' users have upgraded their
>> distros to Fedora 1.0.  I have a Sony DRU-510A drive that I had
>> working under Red Hat 9.0.  After upgrading to Fedora 1.0, I
>> recompiled the dvd tool chain, just to ensure library
>> compatibility.  But neither the RH9-compiled nor the
>> Fedora-compiled versions of 'growisofs' have been producing
>> reliable burns on Fedora 1.0.  I don't end up with any errors
>> during the burn, but reading back the burned disk gives me
>> input/output errors.  Is anyone out there experiencing similar
>> problems?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Maciek Kozyrczak
>>
>> PS: I'm almost suspecting the ide-scsi layer, but I have no
>> evidence to support this.  The reason I'm suspicious is because I
>> can only burn CD-Rs in my Plextor drive in RAW mode (cdrecord),
>> or else I also get I/O errors on read-back.  Is there some known
>> issue with the 'sg' driver?
>
> Well for starters, see this thread:
> http://www.mail-archive.com/cdwrite@other.debian.org/msg04512.html
>
> I did some more experimentation after that, and found out that the
> disc that gave I/O errors actually had three tracks, not one.
> Another disc that had only one track worked perfectly. I haven't
> had time to do more research and figure out what that means and how
> to fix it though.
>
> Lourens
> --
> GPG public key: http://home.student.utwente.nl/l.e.veen/lourens.key
>
>



Reply to: