Re: SPI Web and membership pages
- To: Nils Lohner <lohner@ecf.teradyne.com>
- Cc: spi-general@lists.spi-inc.org, Bill Castrogiovanni <bill@onshore.com>, "Darren O. Benham" <gecko@benham.net>, adam@queso.onshore.com, kristine@onshore.com, Wichert Akkerman <wichert@cistron.nl>, Tony Adams <tony@onshore.com>, csmall@debian.org
- Subject: Re: SPI Web and membership pages
- From: csmall@eye-net.com.au (Craig Small)
- Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2000 09:34:46 +1000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20000822093446.A23397@eye-net.com.au>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200008211021.MAA29147@topaze.ecf.teradyne.com>; from lohner@ecf.teradyne.com on Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:21:11PM +0200
- References: <[🔎] 200008091343.PAA04352@topaze.ecf.teradyne.com> <[🔎] 200008211021.MAA29147@topaze.ecf.teradyne.com>
On Mon, Aug 21, 2000 at 12:21:11PM +0200, Nils Lohner wrote:
> I've updated the page http://purcel.spi-inc.org/member_form.html a little; please let me know if you have comments of sugestions. Other forms need to be mnade:
>
> - a form where the user can later check tha application or membership status etc.
> - a form/process where membership people can process the applicants (Debian's NM's have this; maybe we can use it?)
> - a form to generate reports, i.e. how many members of each type, how many pending, etc.
>
> Craig said he'd be willing to help with this, if anyone else is interested, please let me know. Otherwise I'll gradually work on this as I have time.
I can do this for you guys, I'd probably re-use a lot of the NM code for
this though I have some ideas on making that site better too.
I first need to understand the process, how someone applies, what the
application people do to the application, etc.
I'll also need somewhere to put it. I can run it locally here for a
little while if needed. Basically a box running apache, php4 and
postgresql.
- Craig
--
Craig Small VK2XLZ GnuPG:1C1B D893 1418 2AF4 45EE 95CB C76C E5AC 12CA DFA5
Eye-Net Consulting http://www.eye-net.com.au/ <csmall@eye-net.com.au>
MIEEE <csmall@ieee.org> Debian developer <csmall@debian.org>
Reply to: