On Thu, Apr 15, 1999 at 06:18:36PM -0400, Nils Lohner wrote: > [This resolution lays down some basic definitions that may be important in > the bylaws discussion- especially the voting section. We will probably end > up with different approvals for motions and resolutions- i.e. it should be > easier to add the hosting of a mailing list to SPI that it should be to > change the bylaws themselves, and a simple appointment to a position should > be less difficult that creating a new position etc. > > Comments/additions are welcome. I know some of this is awkwardly worded, > so please feel free to suggest improvements. > --Nils] After reading this proposal, it can be avoided entirely. In many organizations, key documents (such as by-laws, articles, constitutions, etc) include the proceedure for amending themselves. Anything that doesn't have that specification is changed by the "default" method (motion). On top of that, there'd be nothing wrong with a standard "cut-n-paste" of such sections... > -- Please cc all mailing list replies to me, also. ========================================================================= * http://benham.net/index.html <gecko@benham.net> <>< * * -------------------- * -----------------------------------------------* * Debian Developer, Debian Project Secretary, Debian Webmaster * * <gecko@debian.org> <secretary@debian.org> <lintian-maint@debian.org> * * <webmaster@debian.org> <gecko@fortunet.com> <webmaster@spi-inc.org> * =========================================================================
Attachment:
pgpx9K5vX3PHI.pgp
Description: PGP signature