Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library
- To: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>, 753348@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#753348: RFS: gnustep-performance/0.5.0-1 [ITP] -- GNUstep performance library
- From: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Jul 2014 21:23:52 +0300
- Message-id: <87ha2ih45j.GNU's_not_UNIX!%yavor@gnu.org>
- Reply-to: Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>, 753348@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <53C56CBC.3060907__1143.86566351659$1405447596$gmane$org@wollumbin.marsaxlokk.dhcp.io>
- References: <53C542F2.8080402__24805.7844969027$1405436796$gmane$org@wollumbin.marsaxlokk.dhcp.io> <87k37eh8nw.GNU's_not_UNIX!%yavor@gnu.org> <53C56CBC.3060907__1143.86566351659$1405447596$gmane$org@wollumbin.marsaxlokk.dhcp.io>
Paul Gevers wrote:
> Let's just agree that it helps me in helping you getting your
> packages updated in Debian if you document that you thought about
> the lintian warnings (by overriding them with a good comment
> attached).
I see; there's no problem at all for me to do that. It would require
changes again when lintian is fixed but that's no big deal.
As a funny consequence, you don't get these with frameworks, because
apparently for lintian a GNUstep framework is not a library. Which is
why it greets you with postinst/postrm-has-useless-call-to-ldconfig :-)
Reply to: