Bug#752520: RFS: lilyterm/0.9.9.4-1 [ITP]
ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 03:20:46PM +0200, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> > The third case (likely most common one) is when an arch:any
> > package would otherwise contain huge /usr/share. Which doesn't
> > seem to be the case here either.
>
> Actually this is the reason for lilyterm-data.
You should take into account the archive clutter, that's also a
perfectly valid concern.
Lintian issues a warning if the data in /usr/share is more than 4 MB
or more than 2 MB *and* more than 50% of the package. It is not the
case for your package so splitting it does more harm than good, IMO.
Reply to: