Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement
- To: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>
- Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>, Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>, Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, nvdimm@lists.linux.dev, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, ying.huang@intel.com, feng.tang@intel.com, fengwei.yin@intel.com
- Subject: Re: [axboe-block:for-next] [block] 1122c0c1cc: aim7.jobs-per-min 22.6% improvement
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
- Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2024 00:32:07 -0700
- Message-id: <[🔎] ZoOs9wdR1yBPB-7J@infradead.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] ZoJnO09LBj6kApY7@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
- References: <202406250948.e0044f1d-oliver.sang@intel.com> <ZnqGf49cvy6W-xWf@infradead.org> <Znt4qTr/NdeIPyNp@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <ZnuNhkH26nZi8fz6@infradead.org> <ZnzP+nUrk8+9bANK@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <ZnzwbYSaIlT0SIEy@infradead.org> <[🔎] ZoJnO09LBj6kApY7@xsang-OptiPlex-9020>
On Mon, Jul 01, 2024 at 04:22:19PM +0800, Oliver Sang wrote:
> from below, it seems the patchset doesn't introduce any performance improvement
> but a regression now. is this expected?
Not having the improvement at least alleviate my concerns about data
integrity. I'm still curious where it comes from as it isn't exactly
expected.
Reply to: