Re: [PATCH 26/27] block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
- To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
- Cc: "dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>, "linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-um@lists.infradead.org" <linux-um@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>, "drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com" <drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com>, "nbd@other.debian.org" <nbd@other.debian.org>, "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" <ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org" <virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org>, "xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org" <xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org>, "linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org" <linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" <linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>, "linux-s390@vger.kernel.org" <linux-s390@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>, "target-devel@vger.kernel.org" <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>, "linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net" <linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>, "cluster-devel@redhat.com" <cluster-devel@redhat.com>, "jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net" <jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net>, "linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org>, "ntfs3@lists.linux.dev" <ntfs3@lists.linux.dev>, "ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com" <ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com>, "linux-mm@kvack.org" <linux-mm@kvack.org>, "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>, Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com>, Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
- Subject: Re: [PATCH 26/27] block: decouple REQ_OP_SECURE_ERASE from REQ_OP_DISCARD
- From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
- Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 05:51:29 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] ad050f78-2d64-0ff9-a6b0-968cfa53eacf@nvidia.com>
- In-reply-to: <20220415045258.199825-27-hch@lst.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20220415045258.199825-1-hch@lst.de> <20220415045258.199825-27-hch@lst.de>
On 4/14/22 21:52, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Secure erase is a very different operation from discard in that it is
> a data integrity operation vs hint. Fully split the limits and helper
> infrastructure to make the separation more clear.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Reviewed-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
> Acked-by: Christoph Böhmwalder <christoph.boehmwalder@linbit.com> [drbd]
> Acked-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> [nifs2]
> Acked-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org> [f2fs]
> Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de> [bcache]
> Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> [btrfs]
> ---
Looks good.
Reviewed-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
-ck
Reply to: