[PATCH 08/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
- To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
- Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-um@lists.infradead.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, nbd@other.debian.org, ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, linux-raid@vger.kernel.org, linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, cluster-devel@redhat.com, jfs-discussion@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-nilfs@vger.kernel.org, ntfs3@lists.linux.dev, ocfs2-devel@oss.oracle.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
- Subject: [PATCH 08/27] btrfs: use bdev_max_active_zones instead of open coding it
- From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
- Date: Sat, 9 Apr 2022 06:50:24 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20220409045043.23593-9-hch@lst.de>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20220409045043.23593-1-hch@lst.de>
- References: <[🔎] 20220409045043.23593-1-hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
---
fs/btrfs/zoned.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
index 1b1b310c3c510..f72cad7391a11 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/zoned.c
@@ -350,7 +350,6 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info = device->fs_info;
struct btrfs_zoned_device_info *zone_info = NULL;
struct block_device *bdev = device->bdev;
- struct request_queue *queue = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
unsigned int max_active_zones;
unsigned int nactive;
sector_t nr_sectors;
@@ -410,7 +409,7 @@ int btrfs_get_dev_zone_info(struct btrfs_device *device, bool populate_cache)
if (!IS_ALIGNED(nr_sectors, zone_sectors))
zone_info->nr_zones++;
- max_active_zones = queue_max_active_zones(queue);
+ max_active_zones = bdev_max_active_zones(bdev);
if (max_active_zones && max_active_zones < BTRFS_MIN_ACTIVE_ZONES) {
btrfs_err_in_rcu(fs_info,
"zoned: %s: max active zones %u is too small, need at least %u active zones",
--
2.30.2
Reply to: